Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:

Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

The Scope and Meaning of Police Power

Charles Bufford
California Law Review
Vol. 4, No. 4 (May, 1916), pp. 269-292
DOI: 10.2307/3474634
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3474634
Page Count: 24
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 105 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    (1882), 60 Cal. 177, 196, 210, 9 Pacific Coast Law Journal 163.
  • 2
    (1884), 65 Cal. 33, 2 Pac. 500.
  • 3
    (1885), 68 Cal. 284, 289, 9 Pac. 173.
  • 4
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1885), 68 Cal. 294, 297, 9 Pac. 139, 58 Am. Rep. 12
    • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), 118 U. S. 356, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1064, 30 L. Ed. 220
  • 5
    (1902), 135 Cal. 415, 419, 67 Pac. 504.
  • 6
    (1906), 149 Cal. 79, 80, 84 Pac. 766, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.), 183, 9 Ann. Cas. 747.
  • 7
    (1906), 149 Cal. 758, 762, 87 Pac. 909.
  • 8
    (1907), 6 Cal. App. 233, 237, 91 Pac. 811.
  • 9
    (1911), 159 Cal. 508, 511, 114 Pac. 835, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 969.
  • 10
    This reference contains 7 citations:
    • Cemetery Ass'n v. San Francisco (1903), 140 Cal. 226, 235, 73 Pac. 987
    • Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 612, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796
    • Ex parte Newell (1906), 2 Cal. App. 767, 768, 84 Pac. 226
    • Ex parte Elam (1907), 6 Cal. App. 233, 237, 91 Pac. 811
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 228, 118 Pac. 714
    • Ex parte Miller (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 692, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
  • 11
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Ex parte Hayden (1905), 147 Cal. 649, 650, 82 Pac. 315, 109 Am. St. Rep. 183, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 184
    • Ex parte Drexel (1905), 147 Cal. 763, 766, 82 Pac. 429, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 588, 3 Ann. Cas. 878
    • Goytino v. McAleer (1906), 4 Cal. App. 655, 658, 88 Pac. 991
    • Ex parte Stolten- berg (1913), 21 Cal. App. 722, 132 Pac. 841.
  • 12
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1894), 38 Pac. 315
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1895), 106 Cal. 113, 122, 39 Pac, 437, 46 Am. St. Rep. 221, 28 L. R. A. 187
  • 13
    Sonora v. Curtin (1902), 137 Cal. 583, 585, 70 Pac. 674.
  • 14
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury (1915), 50 Cal. Dec. 172, 291, 151 Pac. 398
    • Compare Reed v. Collins (1907), 5 Cal. App. 494, 503, 90 Pac. 973
    • Ex parte Mitchell (1912), 19 Cal. App. 567, 571, 126 Pac. 856.
  • 15
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Cemetery Ass'n v. San Francisco (1903), 140 Cal. 226, 235, 73 Pac. 987
    • Ex parte Zhizhuzza (1905), 147 Cal. 328, 335, 81 Pac. 955.
  • 16
    French v. Davidson (1904), 143 Cal. 658, 662, 77 Pac. 663.
  • 17
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Grumbach v. Lelande (1908), 154 Cal. 679, 684, 98 Pac. 1059
    • Ex parte Hadacheck (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 420, 132 Pac. 584.
  • 18
    Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 228, 118 Pac. 714.
  • 19
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1907), 152 Cal. 464, 475, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas. 1080
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1910), 216 U. S. 358, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 201, 54 L. Ed. 515
  • 20
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Dobbins v. Los Angeles (1904), 195 U. S. 223, 238, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 18, 49 L. Ed. 169
    • Dobbins v. Los Angeles (1903), 139 Cal. 179, 72 Pac. 970, 96 Am. St. Rep. 95
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 226, 118 Pac. 714
  • 21
    (1896), 112 Cal. 468, 472, 473, 44 Pac. 803, 32 L. R. A. 664.
  • 22
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Ex parte Koser (1882), 60 Cal. 177, 210, 9 Pacific Coast Law Journal 163
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1894), 38 Pac. 315
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1895), 106 Cal. 113, 123, 39 Pac. 437, 46 Am. St. Rep. 221, 28 L. R. A. 187
    • Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 612, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796
    • Ex parte Quarg (1906), 149 Cal. 79, 81, 84 Pac. 766, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 183, 9 Ann. Cas. 747.
  • 23
    Sonora v. Curtin (1902), 137 Cal. 583, 585, 70 Pac. 674.
  • 24
    Ex parte Anixter (1913), 22 Cal. App. 117, 124, 134 Pac. 193.
  • 25
    Ex parte Drexel (1905), 147 Cal. 763, 766, 82 Pac. 429, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 588, 3 Ann. Cas. 878.
  • 26
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 693, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
  • 27
    This reference contains 9 citations:
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1894), 38 Pac. 315
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1895), 106 Cal. 113, 123, 39 Pac. 437, 46 Am. St. Rep. 221, 28 L. R. A. 187
    • Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 612, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796
    • Ex parte Hayden (19.05), 147 Cal. 649, 650, 82 Pac. 315, 109 Am. St. Rep. 183, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 184
    • Ex parte Quarg (1906), 1, 49 Cal. 79, 80, 81, 84 Pac. 766, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 183, 9 Ann. Cas. 747
    • Ex parte Dietrich (1906), 149 Cal. 104, 106, 84 Pac. 770, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 873
    • Ex parte Miller (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 693, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
    • Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. San Mateo County (1914), 167 Cal. 434, 440, 139 Pac. 1068.
  • 28
    Schaezlein v. Cabaniss (1902), 135 Cal. 466, 468, 67 Pac. 755, 87 Am. St. Rep. 122, 56 L. R. A. 733.
  • 29
    McFadden v. Board of Supervisors (1888), 74 Cal. 571, 573, 574, 16 Pac. 397.
  • 30
    (1887), 73 Cal. 142, 145, 14 Pac. 405.
  • 31
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 694, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
  • 32
    (1906), 149 Cal. 79, 81, 84 Pac. 766, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 183, 9 Ann. Cas. 747.
  • 33
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1907), 152 Cal. 464, 470, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas. 1080
    • (1910), 216 U. S. 358, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 301, 54 L. Ed. 515
  • 34
    (1909), 10 Cal. App. 602, 605, 103 Pac. 159.
  • 35
    (1909), 11 Cal. App. 511, 513, 105 Pac. 609.
  • 36
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 694, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373. 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
  • 37
    (1913), 21 Cal. App. 722, 724, 132 Pac. 841. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628.
  • 38
    (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 421, 132 Pac. 584.
  • 39
    (1913), 166 Cal. 640, 662, 137 Pac. 1119.
  • 40
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Ex parte Cheney (1891), 90 Cal. 617, 620, 27 Pac. 436
    • Los Angeles County v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'n (1899), 124 Cal. 344, 347, 348, 57 Pac. 153, 71 Am. St. Rep. 75
    • Ex parte Smith (1904), 143 Cal. 368, 372, 373, 77 Pac. 180
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 233, 118 Pac. 714.
  • 41
    This reference contains 11 citations:
    • Ex parte Lacey (1895), 108 Cal. 326, 328, 41 Pac. 411, 49 Am. St. Rep. 93, 38 L. R. A. 640
    • Cemetery Ass'n v. San Fran- cisco (1903), 140 Cal. 226, 231, 73 Pac. 987
    • Goytino v. McAleer (1906), 4 Cal. App. 655, 657, 88 Pac. 991
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Fran- cisco (1907), 152 Cal. 464, 474, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas. 1080
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Fran- cisco (1910), 216 U. S. 358, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 201, 54 L. Ed. 515
    • Ex parte Murphy (1908), 8 Cal. App. 440, 445, 97 Pac. 199
    • Ex parte Murphy (1909), 155 Cal. 322, 100 Pac. 1134
    • Ex parte Junqua (1909), 10 Cal. App. 602, 605, 103 Pac. 159
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 228, 118 Pac. 714
    • Ex parte Stolten- berg (1913), 21 Cal. App. 722, 724, 132 Pac. 841
    • Ex parte Hadacheck (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 419, 132 Pac. 584.
  • 42
    This reference contains 23 citations:
    • Ex parte Moynier (1884), 65 Cal. 33, 36, 2 Pac. 500
    • Ex parte Kohler (1887), 74 Cal. 38, 42, 15 Pac. 436
    • Abeel v. Clark (1890), 84 Cal. 226, 230, 24 Pac. 383
    • Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 78, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727
    • Woodward v. Fruitvale Sanitary District (1893), 99 Cal. 554, 562, 34 Pac. 239
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1894), 38 Pac. 315
    • Ingram v. Colgan (1895), 106 Cal. 113, 122, 39 Pac. 437, 46 Am. St. Rep. 221, 28 L. R. A. 187
    • Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 612, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796
    • Ex parte Hayden (1905), 147 Cal. 649, 650, 82 Pac. 315, 109 Am. St. Rep. 183, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 184
    • Ex parte Drexel (1905), 147 Cal. 763, 766, 82 Pac. 429, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 588, 3 Ann. Cas. 878
    • Ex parte Quarg (1906), 149 Cal. 79, 81, 84 Pac. 766, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 183, 9 Ann. Cas. 747
    • Plumas County v. Wheeler (1906), 149 Cal. 758, 762, 87 Pac. 909
    • Goytino v. McAleer (1906), 4 Cal. App. 655, 657, 88 Pac. 991
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1907), 152 Cal. 464, 474, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas. 1080
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1910), 216 U. S. 358, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 201, 54 L. Ed. 515
    • Ex parte Quong (1911), 159 Cal. 508, 511, 114 Pac. 835, Ann. Cas. 1912 C 969
    • Ex parte Miller (1912), 162 Cal. 687, 694, 124 Pac. 427
    • Miller v. Wilson (1915), 236 U. S. 373, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 342, 59 L. Ed. 628
    • Ex parte Hadacheck (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 419, 132 Pac. 584
    • Williams v. Wheeler (1913), 23 Cal. App. 619, 625, 138 Pac. 937
    • Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. San Mateo County (1914), 167 Cal. 434, 440, 139 Pac. 1068
    • Ex parte Dickey (1904), 144 Cal. 234, 77 Pac. 924, 103 Am. St. Rep. 82, 66 L. R. A. 928, 1 Ann. Cas. 428
    • Shaw, J., dissenting, said (p. 242): "The police power.... is not limited in its application to such laws as may be deemed necessary for the preservation of the general health and comfort. It embraces also the preservation and promotion of the general welfare and prosperity."
  • 43
    Varney & Green v. Williams (1909), 155 Cal. 318, 320, 100 Pac. 867, 132 Am. St. Rep. 88, 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 741
  • 44
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. San Mateo County (1914), 167 Cal. 434, 438, 139 Pac. 1068.
    • Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 83, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727
  • 45
    Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. San Mateo County (1914), 167 Cal. 434, 439, 139 Pac. 1068.
  • 46
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 82, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727
    • Cemetery Ass'n v. San Fran- cisco (1903), 140 Cal. 226, 234, 73 Pac. 987
  • 47
    Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 82, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727.
  • 48
    Cemetery Ass'n v. San Francisco (1903), 140 Cal. 226, 232, 73 Pac. 987
  • 49
    This reference contains 8 citations:
    • Otis v. Parker (1903), 187 U. S. 606, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 168, 47 L. Ed. 323
    • Parker v. Otis (1900), 130 Cal. 322, 62 Pac. 571, 92 Am. St. Rep. 56
    • Const. Cal., Art. 4, sec. 26
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1910), 216 U. S. 358, 365, 366, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 201, 54 L. Ed. 515
    • (1907), 152 Cal. 464, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas.1080
    • Ex parte Yun Quong (1911), 159 Cal. 508, 515, 114 Pac. 835, Ann. Cas. 1912 C 969
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 234, 118 Pac. 714.
    • Ex parte Koser (1882), 60 Cal. 177, 213, 214, 9 Pac. Coast Law Journal 163
  • 50
    Ex parte Lee (1915), 21 Cal. App. Dec. 632, 153 Pac. 992.
  • 51
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ex parte Murphy (1908), 8 Cal. App. 440, 444, 97 Pac. 199
    • Ex parte Murphy (1909), 155 Cal. 322, 100 Pac. 1134.
  • 52
    Ex parte Ackerman (1907), 6 Cal. App. 5, 15, 91 Pac. 429.
  • 53
    Ex parte Smith (1904), 143 Cal. 368, 371, 77 Pac. 180.
  • 54
    Ex parte San Chung (1909), 11 Cal. App. 511, 516, 105 Pac. 609.
  • 55
    Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 81, 85, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727.
  • 56
    Ex parte Luening (1906), 3 Cal. App. 76, 81, 84 Pac. 445.
  • 57
    Ex parte Flaherty (1895), 105 Cal. 558, 560, 38 Pac. 981, 27 L. R. A. 529.
  • 58
    Ex parte Tuttle (1891), 91 Cal. 589, 591, 27 Pac. 933.
  • 59
    This reference contains 10 citations:
    • Ex parte Christensen (1890), 85 Cal. 208, 213, 24 Pac. 747
    • Crowley v. Christensen (1890), 137 U. S. 86, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 13, 34 L. Ed. 620
    • Denton v. Vann (1908), 8 Cal. App. 677, 680, 97 Pac. 675
    • Ritz v. Lightston (1909), 10 Cal. App. 685, 688, 103 Pac. 363
    • Ex parte Cutting (1911), 17 Cal. App. 604, 608, 121 Pac. 304
    • Guzzi v. McAllister (1913), 21 Cal. App. 276, 278, 131 Pac. 336
    • Ex parte Anixter (1913), 22 Cal. App. 117, 121, 134 Pac. 193
    • Ex parte Ellsworth (1913), 165 Cal. 677, 685, 133 Pac. 272
    • Giddings v. Board of Trustees (1913), 165 Cal. 695, 697, 133 Pac. 479
    • Ex parte Anixter (1914), 166 Cal. 762, 138 Pac. 353.
  • 60
    Selma v. Brewer (1908), 9 Cal. App. 70, 76, 98 Pac. 61.
  • 61
    Ex parte Dart (1916), 155 Pac. 63, 51 Cal. Dec. 178, per Shaw, Sloss, J. J., Angellotti, C. J., & Lawlor, J., concurring in judgment.
  • 62
    Los Angeles County v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'n (1899), 124 Cal. 344, 349, 57 Pac. 153, 71 Am. St. Rep. 75
  • 63
    Ex parte Sing Lee (1892), 96 Cal. 354, 359, 31 Pac. 245, 31 Am. St. Rep. 218, 24 L. R. A. 195
  • 64
    Western Granite & Marble Co. v. Knickerbocker (1894), 103 Cal. 111, 115, 37 Pac. 192.
  • 65
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ex parte Christensen (1890), 85 Cal. 208, 213, 24 Pac. 747
    • Crowley v. Christensen (1890), 137 U. S. 86, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 13, 34 L. Ed. 620
  • 66
    Ex parte Cheney (1891), 90 Cal. 617, 621, 622, 27 Pac. 436.
  • 67
    Ex parte McClain (1901), 134 Cal. 110, 66 Pac. 69, 86 Am. St. Rep. 243.
  • 68
    Ex parte Luening (1906), 3 Cal. App. 76, 78, 84 Pac. 445.
  • 69
    Ex parte Yun Quong (1911), 159 Cal. 508, 114 Pac. 835, Ann. Cas. 1912C 969.
  • 70
    Ex parte Luera (1915), 21 Cal. App. Dec. 319, 152 Pac. 738.
  • 71
    Ex parte Luera, supra, n. 70.
  • 72
    Ex parte Cardinal (1915), 50 Cal. Dec. 37, 150 Pac. 348.
  • 73
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Los Angeles County v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'n (1899), 124 Cal. 344, 349, 57 Pac. 153, 71 Am. St. Rep. 75
    • Plumas County v. Wheeler (1906), 149 Cal. 758, 763, 87 Pac. 909
    • Ex parte Ackerman (1907), 6 Cal. App. 5, 16, 19, 91 Pac. 429
    • Rapp & Son v. Kiel (1911), 159 Cal. 702, 115 Pac. 651
    • Ex parte Gilstrap (1915), 50 Cal. Dec. 343, 152 Pac. 42.
  • 74
    Ex parte Ackerman (1907), 6 Cal. App. 5, 15, 16, 91 Pac. 429.
  • 75
    Plumas County v. Wheeler (1906), 149 Cal. 758, 767, 768, 87 Pac. 909.
  • 76
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Plumas County v. Wheeler, supra, n. 75
    • Ex parte McCoy (1909), 10 Cal. App. 116, 137, 140, 101 Pac. 419
    • Ex parte Miller (1910), 13 Cal. App. 564, 567, 110 Pac. 139
    • Ex parte Schuler (1914), 167 Cal. 282, 287, 288, 139 Pac. 685.
  • 77
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Ex parte McCoy (1909), 10 Cal. App. 116, 140, 101 Pac. 419
    • Ex parte Schuler (1914), 167 Cal. 282, 286, 139 Pac. 685
    • 1915 Cal. Stats. p. 639
  • 78
    Ex parte Richardson (1914), 146 Pac. 520.
  • 79
    Ex parte McNally (1887), 73 Cal. 632, 15 Pac. 368.
  • 80
    Plumas County v. Wheeler (1906), 149 Cal. 758, 87 Pac. 909.
  • 81
    Rapp & Son v. Kiel (1911), 159 Cal. 702, 706, 115 Pac. 651.
  • 82
    Ex parte John (1911), 17 Cal. App. 58, 67, 118 Pac. 722.
  • 83
    Ex parte Gilstrap (1915), 50 Cal. Dec. 343, 152 Pac. 42.
  • 84
    Ex parte Miller (1900), 13 Cal. App. 564, 567, 110 Pac. 139
  • 85
    San Francisco v. Liverpool etc. Insurance Co. (1887), 74 Cal. 113, 123, 15 Pac. 380, 5 Am. St. Rep. 425.
  • 86
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Merced County v. Helm (1894), 102 Cal. 159, 163, 36 Pac. 399.
    • Ex parte Mason (1894), 102 Cal. 171, 36 Pac. 401
  • 87
    Ex parte Richardson (1915), 49 Cal. Dec. 593.
  • 88
    Ex parte McCoy (1909), 10 Cal. App. 116, 133, 101 Pac. 419.
  • 89
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Ex parte Heilbron (1884), 65 Cal. 609, 610, 4 Pac. 648
    • Ex parte Yick Wo (1885), 68 Cal. 294, 297, 9 Pac. 139, 58 Am. Rep. 12
    • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), 118 U. S. 356, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1064, 30 L. Ed. 220
    • Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 230, 118 Pac. 714
    • Ex parte Montgomery (1912), 163 Cal. 457, 458, 125 Pac. 1070
    • Ex parte Hadacheck (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 419, 132 Pac. 584.
  • 90
    This reference contains 4 citations:
    • Ex parte Yick Wo (1885), 68 Cal. 294, 297, 9 Pac. 139, 58 Am. Rep. 12
    • Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), 118 U. S. 356, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1064, 30 L. Ed. 220
    • Ex parte Fiske (1887), 72 Cal. 125, 13 Pac. 310
    • Ex parte Newell (1906), 2 Cal. App. 767, 768, 84 Pac. 226.
  • 91
    Ex parte Tuttle (1891), 91 Cal. 589, 27 Pac. 933.
  • 92
    Ex parte Lacey (1895), 108 Cal. 326, 335, 41 Pac. 411, 49 Am. St. Rep. 93, 38 L. R. A. 640
  • 93
    This reference contains 2 citations:
    • Ex parte Murphy (1908), 8 Cal. App. 440, 444, 97 Pac. 199
    • Ex parte Murphy (1909), 155 Cal. 322, 100 Pac. 1134.
  • 94
    Ex parte Montgomery (1912), 163 Cal. 457, 458, 125 Pac. 1070
  • 95
    Ex parte Hadacheck (1913), 165 Cal. 416, 419, 132 Pac. 584
  • 96
    Ex parte San Chung (1909), 11 Cal. App. 511, 516, 105 Pac. 609.
  • 97
    Ex parte Quong Wo (1911), 161 Cal. 220, 228, 18 Pac. 714
  • 98
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Laurel Hill Cemetery v. San Francisco (1907), 152 Cal. 646, 472, 93 Pac. 70, 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 260, 14 Ann. Cas. 1080
    • (1910), 216, U. S. 358, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 201, 54 L. Ed. 515
    • Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. San Mateo County (1914), 167 Cal. 434, 438, 139 Pac. 1068.
  • 99
    Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 613, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796.
  • 1
    This reference contains 5 citations:
    • Ex parte McClain (1882), 61 Cal. 436, 10 Pacific Coast Law Journal, 223, 44 Am. Rep. 554
    • Grumbach v. Lelande (1908), 154 Cal. 679, 683, 98 Pac. 1059
    • Ex parte Burke (1911), 160 Cal. 300, 303, 116 Pac. 755
    • Richter v. Lightston (1911), 161 Cal. 260, 264, 118 Pac. 790, Ann. Cas. 1913B 1082
    • McRae v. Pine (1914), 25 Cal. App. 594, 598, 144 Pac. 983.
  • 2
    Ex parte Kelso (1905), 147 Cal. 609, 612, 82 Pac. 241, 109 Am. St. Rep. 178, 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 796.
  • 3
    Ex parte Smith (1904), 143 Cal. 368, 370, 77 Pac. 180.
  • 4
    Ex parte Smith (1904), 143 Cal. 368, 77 Pac. 180.
  • 5
    Ex parte Whitwell (1893), 98 Cal. 73, 83, 32 Pac. 870, 35 Am. St. Rep. 152, 19 L. R. A. 727.
  • 6
    Ex parte Zhizhuzza (1905), 147 Cal. 328, 335, 81 Pac. 955.