You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Thorstein Veblen's Theories of Governmental Failure: The Critic of Capitalism and Democracy Neglected Some Useful Insights, Hindsight Shows
Charles G. Leathers
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Vol. 48, No. 3 (Jul., 1989), pp. 293-306
Published by: American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3487364
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In The Theory of Business Enterprise, Thorstein Veblen introduced a general theory of governmental failure in constitutional democracies based on the common man's delusion that policies benefiting businessmen also benefited him. This general theory runs consistently through Veblen's later works and was developed more fully in The Vested Interests and the Common Man. But other elements of an economic theory of government introduced in The Theory of Business Enterprise were less durable. A briefly sketched economic theory of political parties was never mentioned again in any of Veblen's subsequent writings. A concept of governmental officials pursuing their own self-interest did reappear in Veblen's wartime works, but was completely missing in Absentee Ownership. The concept of a Leviathan-type government which pursued policies detrimental to the interests of both the common man and businessmen was repudiated in The Nature of Peace. The conditions for its existence had been eroded by the influence of modern industrial technology on military operations.
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology © 1989 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.