You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Henry George and Europe: Precursors of Land Reform in Germany: Marx and the Land Question; The Beginnings of the Georgist Movement in the Empire
Michael Silagi and Susan N. Faulkner
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology
Vol. 51, No. 2 (Apr., 1992), pp. 247-256
Published by: American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3487397
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Land reform, Agricultural land, Economic capital, Labor, Monopoly, Poverty, Socialism, Landowners, Private land, Expropriation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Henry George's "Progress and Poverty" was translated into German and published in Germany in 1881, a little more than a year after its publication in America. But it was not through George's own words that his ideas first became known there. Germany already had land reformers, organized in small societies. They made his teachings known. However, unlike the case in Britain, Germany's leftists did not welcome George's land reform ideas. True, Karl Marx recognized and wrote about the role the land question played in the exploitation of labor and in his third volume of Capital took basic positions parallel to George's; it was published long after "Progress and Poverty." The hostility of Wilhelm Liebknecht toward land reform reflected the German public's disinterest in the land question and may explain why Marx concentrated on appealing to the urban industrial worker.
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology © 1992 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.