You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Definitions of Cult: From Sociological-Technical to Popular-Negative
James T. Richardson
Review of Religious Research
Vol. 34, No. 4 (Jun., 1993), pp. 348-356
Published by: Religious Research Association, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3511972
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cults, Sociology of religion, Christianity, Churches, Religion, Social research, Conceptualization, Political sociology, Social psychology, Social theories
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper examines the theoretical and historical development of the term "cult," from its inception in the work of Troeltsch to more modern delineations of the term in the work of researchers studying new religious groups. The usurpation of the term by popular usage associated with strong negative connotations is discussed, along with efforts by a few contemporary scholars to salvage the term by redefining it in ways which attempt to combine traditional and popular meanings. The futility of this approach is discussed, and the paper concludes with suggestions that scholars should avoid the term and that it should not be allowed to be used in legal proceedings because of its confused and negatively connoted meaning in contemporary society.
Review of Religious Research © 1993 Religious Research Association, Inc.