You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Popularity of Strict Churches
Joseph B. Tamney and Stephen D. Johnson
Review of Religious Research
Vol. 39, No. 3 (Mar., 1998), pp. 209-223
Published by: Religious Research Association, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3512589
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
After briefly reviewing Kelley's ideal-church model, and relevant aspects of modernization theory, we set forth hypotheses about who favors church strictness, an essential aspect of Kelley's model. Data came from a sample of "Middletown" residents (N = 567). It was necessary to distinguish strictness and authoritativeness. While respondents did not believe church strictness is important, authoritative preachers were highly favored. Regression analyses showed that strictness was somewhat more important to the less educated. Authoritativeness was mainly valued by fundamentalists, and to a lesser extent by authoritarians and political conservatives. We conclude with a discussion of how the relative appeal of strictness and authoritativeness can be understood in terms of the current stage of modernity.
Review of Religious Research © 1998 Religious Research Association, Inc.