You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Why No New Phyla after the Cambrian? Genome and Ecospace Hypotheses Revisited
James W. Valentine
Vol. 10, No. 2 (Apr., 1995), pp. 190-194
Published by: SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3515182
Page Count: 5
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Considering the implications of the phylogenetic tree, the fossil record suggests that all metazoan phyla had originated by the close of the Early Cambrian. Two hypotheses for the ensuing restriction on body-plan origination are 1) that genomes have become modified so as to preclude the origin of major morphological novelty; and 2) that the environment has become so widely occupied by numbers of distinctive lineages that any evolutionary opportunities are quickly exploited by existing clades. The burgeoning array of findings on the molecular basis of development suggests that the genome hypothesis is unlikely to explain the restriction on evolutionary novelty. Body plans are specified through a system of pattern-formation and selector genes that was in place before the Cambrian explosion; although this system has been modified within different clades as they have diverged, there are no indications that the creative ability of regulatory genomes has been impaired. A model of ecospace occupation involving evolutionary preclusion and access appears to be consistent with the data as now understood.
PALAIOS © 1995 SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology