You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Measuring Accountability for Results in Interagency Collaboratives
Public Administration Review
Vol. 64, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 2004), pp. 591-606
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3542540
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Government services, Children, Public administration, Collaboration, Child psychology, Technical support, Financial management, Child welfare, Governance, Social policy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This article examines the intersection of two types of innovations that are increasingly common in public administration-accountability for results and interagency collaboration. Recent scholarship suggests four approaches that collaborators can use to increase their accountability for results. The article proposes measures of these four approaches to assess a collaborative's capacity for accountability, and uses them to compare the accountability of human services collaboratives in 10 states. The findings indicate that collaboratives tend to use the four approaches together with one another. In combination, the various approaches may help collaborators manage their stake holders' expectations about their actions and accomplishments. Further research is needed to determine whether a collaborative's capacity for accountability for results actually correlates with improvements in outcomes.
Public Administration Review © 2004 American Society for Public Administration