You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-)
Vol. 55, No. 218 (Jan., 2005), pp. 98-101
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St. Andrews
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3542772
Page Count: 4
Preview not available
In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it is justifiable to set up the system in this way in the first place, then this justification will transmit to all actions carried out under it; and that it is justifiable to set up an institution of punishment in this way.
The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) © 2005 Oxford University Press