You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Interspecific Competition in Ground-Beetle Assemblages (Carabidae): What Have We Learned?
Vol. 66, No. 2 (Mar., 1993), pp. 325-335
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3544821
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Species, Interspecific competition, Beetles, Ecological competition, Niche differentiation, Synecology, Population ecology, Coleoptera, Ecology, Evolution
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Studies of interspecific competition and resource partitioning among ground-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) are reviewed. Half of the 32 papers reported that interspecific competition was operating in extant carabid assemblages or was responsible for apparent resource partitioning. However, severe effects, such as competitive exclusion, were not demonstrated. Although action of competition in the past was often invoked to explain apparent resource partitioning, in general evidence is weak. Overall, many authors emphasized the role of competition in their systems but could not dismiss alternative explanations for community patterns. Usually only competition was studied, and its importance in relation to other factors influencing properties of carabid assemblages was rarely examined. Most studies were restricted to competition among adults but interactions between adults and larvae or between larvae may be more important. I conclude that both manipulative and non-manipulative studies should be used to further dissect effects of competition and other determinants of community organization. Combining studies of species history (phylogeny) and present day ecology should also provide further understanding of the importance of interspecific competition in community organization.
Oikos © 1993 Nordic Society Oikos