You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Foraging and Evading Predators: The Effect of Predator Species on a Behavioural Trade-Off by a Lotic Mayfly
Garry J. Scrimgeour and Joseph M. Culp
Vol. 69, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 71-79
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3545285
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Predators, Predation, Foraging, Larvae, Food, Diatoms, Fish, Streams, Mortality, Species
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We performed laboratory experiments to test the hypothesis that predator species influenced a forager's trade-off between predation risk and food reward. Larvae of the stream mayfly, Baetis tricaudatus Dodds, were provided with simultaneous access to feeding patches in laboratory streams that differed in predation risk (safe, risky) and food reward (low, high). Predation risk was imposed using either: (1) a fish predator, the longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae (Valenciennes), (2) a stonefly predator, Claassenia sabulosa (Banks), and (3) both predators in risky patches at the same time. We hypothesized that predator species would influence the behavioural trade-off between predation risk and food reward because mortality risk on Baetis from Rhinichthys exceeds that from Claassenia. Moreover, the presence of Rhinichthys reduces the foraging activities of Claassenia. Although Baetis spent the majority of time in safe patches, the use of risky patches increased three to five-fold when they contained high food, compared with low food reward. Increased use of risky, high food patches by Baetis was associated with a food-dependent, anti-predator flight response. The mean distance at which large Baetis reacted to Claassenia and Rhinichthys by drifting out of patches was almost four times lower in high food, compared to low food, risky patches. Based on the four trade-off models described by Fraser and Huntingford, Baetis adopted a risk-adjusting trade-off irrespective of whether risk was imposed by Rhinichthys, Claassenia or both predator species at the same time. Thus, the behavioural trade-off between predation risk and food reward adopted by Baetis was independent of predator species.
Oikos © 1994 Nordic Society Oikos