You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Influences of Patch Size and Microhabitat on the Demography of Two Old-Field Rodents
James L. Dooley, Jr. and Michael A. Bowers
Vol. 75, No. 3 (Apr., 1996), pp. 453-462
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3545886
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We used capture/recapture methods to test the responses of two small mammal species (Peromyscus leucopus and Microtus pennsylvanicus) to small- (microhabitat) and large- (patch) scale habitat variation. Analyses examined the responses of individuals to microhabitat variation among trap stations as well as differences in the density and persistence time of adults and juveniles, and the proportion of reproductive females on experimentally created patches of three sizes (0.0625, 0.25, and 1.0 ha). With the exception of transient P. leucopus, all groups shared significant correlations with microhabitat at the scale of trap stations. By contrast, only juvenile P. leucopus exhibited a response to patch-size (i.e., higher densities on small relative to larger patches). Microhabitat differences among patches also accounted for variation in M. pennsylvanicus densities (but not P. leucopus) in analyses of covariance. Our results suggest that both individuals and populations of M. pennsylvanicus responded to habitat variation at the microhabitat scale, while P. leucopus appeared to respond to both microhabitat and patch scale habitat variation. We note that species characteristics (particularly relative dispersal ability) may prove critical in predicting the scale of habitat responses. We conclude by noting that current theory that assumes uniform responses of population to homogeneous patches is too simplistic to be of much predictive value in field tests.
Oikos © 1996 Nordic Society Oikos