You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The "File Drawer Problem" of Non-Significant Results: Does It Apply to Biological Research?
Ryan D. Csada, Paul C. James and Richard H. M. Espie
Vol. 76, No. 3 (Sep., 1996), pp. 591-593
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3546355
Page Count: 3
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Literature, Botany, Psychology, Biology, Psychological research, Ecological genetics, Ecology, Research biases, Zoology, Ecophysiology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We show that there appears to be a publication bias against non-significant results in the biological literature. We suggest reasons why non-significant results are not published, the implications of not publishing non-significant results, and why we need to correct the problem.
Oikos © 1996 Nordic Society Oikos