Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Plant Defenses as Complementary Resources: A Test with Squirrels

Kenneth A. Schmidt, Joel S. Brown and Robert A. Morgan
Oikos
Vol. 81, No. 1 (Feb., 1998), pp. 130-142
Published by: Wiley on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos
DOI: 10.2307/3546475
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3546475
Page Count: 13
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Plant Defenses as Complementary Resources: A Test with Squirrels
Preview not available

Abstract

Generalist herbivores often grow better on mixed diets suggesting that resource types are complementary. We use a consumer-resource framework to develop criteria by which nutritional relationships among foods can be determined from a forager's patch use behavior. Two resources are complementary when at least one yields diminishing returns or the resources interact beneficially with each other. These sufficient conditions may arise when food types contain different plant secondary compounds. We tested for complementarity using fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) and gray squirrels (S. carolinensis) feeding on sunflower seeds treated with tannic or oxalic acid. We used giving-up densities on these two foods in experimental food patches to assay the deterrent effect of each toxin, and to determine whether squirrels treat the toxins as complementary. Squirrels had their highest giving-up densities on oxalate-treated seeds and their lowest on water-treated (control) seeds. Augmenting with oxalate-treated seeds resulted in an increased giving-up density on oxalate-treated seeds relative to tannin-treated seeds. The data suggest that 1) oxalates strongly deter and tannins mildly deter feeding by squirrels, 2) foods containing oxalates or tannins are complementary, and 3) the complementarity of foods containing the two toxins is due primarily to the effect of oxalates. The marginal toxicity of oxalates increases with dose, while that of tannin does not seem to increase with dose.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
130
    130
  • Thumbnail: Page 
131
    131
  • Thumbnail: Page 
132
    132
  • Thumbnail: Page 
133
    133
  • Thumbnail: Page 
134
    134
  • Thumbnail: Page 
135
    135
  • Thumbnail: Page 
136
    136
  • Thumbnail: Page 
137
    137
  • Thumbnail: Page 
138
    138
  • Thumbnail: Page 
139
    139
  • Thumbnail: Page 
140
    140
  • Thumbnail: Page 
141
    141
  • Thumbnail: Page 
142
    142
Part of Sustainability