You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Co-Occurrence of Australian Land Birds: Diamond's Assembly Rules Revisited
Nicholas J. Gotelli, Neil J. Buckley and John A. Wiens
Vol. 80, No. 2 (Nov., 1997), pp. 311-324
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3546599
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Using null model simulations, we tested for non-random patterns of local co-occurrence in 28 congeneric guilds of the Australian avifauna. At the scale of 1° latitude-longitude blocks, species in most guilds co-occurred more often than expected by chance. However, coexistence was significantly less than expected for six of the 28 guilds. In four of these guilds (Climacteris, Cinclosoma, Manorina, and Psophodes), the species were segregated by habitat use and/or geographic range. The remaining two cases were complicated by uncertainty in taxonomy (Malurus) and unreliable field records (Corvus). We also examined distribution patterns in five Australian guilds that are analogs of avian guilds designated by Diamond for the Bismarck Archipelago. For two of the five guilds (Pachycephala and Zosterops), co-occurrence in Australia was less than expected, mirroring an insular pattern of "checkerboard distributions" in the Bismarck Archipelago. For the remaining three guilds (Ptilonopus, Myzomela, and Lonchura), co-occurrence was significantly greater than expected. Overall, our results suggest that competitive-based assembly rules are not important in determining species coexistence within most congeneric guilds of the Australian avifauna, at least at the large spatial scale of our analysis.
Oikos © 1997 Nordic Society Oikos