You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Plankton Community Structure in Fluctuating Environments and the Role of Productivity
Beatrix E. Beisner
Vol. 95, No. 3 (Dec., 2001), pp. 496-510
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3547506
Page Count: 15
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Environmental variability in space and time can have significant influences on community structure. Temporal heterogeneity in nutrient supply has been shown in laboratory studies to have strong impacts on the diversity and composition of phytoplankton communities, depending on the scale of fluctuations. This paper extends the work in chemostats in a number of ways: using large-scale field mesocosms with natural plankton communities exposed to various frequencies of vertical mixing, modifying environmental productivity and incorporating higher trophic levels. The first major question and experiment focus on whether vertical mixing at various frequencies, and the associated nutrient pulse, has similar effects in nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor environments for predominantly single trophic level systems. The results indicate that the temporal scale of fluctuation is more of a structuring factor for phytoplankton communities in enriched enclosures, with little response under oligotrophic conditions. The second experiment examines the responsiveness of entire plankton communities (three trophic levels). Major shifts in community structure were absent under both nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor conditions. Responses were seen only in the demography of the top trophic level (Chaoborus flavicans). It appears from these experiments that the spatial disruption that accompanies mixing events may be more important than the temporal component (nutrient pulses) for phytoplankton. This appears to be the case only under conditions where natural spatial heterogeneity is high as it is when systems are enriched. When nutrient pulses are small, as they are in oligotrophic systems where recycling is efficient, little phytoplankton community response is observed. Finally, the inclusion of entire plankton food webs here suppressed the effects of the scale of intermittency in water column mixing at both low and high nutrient levels for all but the highest trophic level.
Oikos © 2001 Nordic Society Oikos