If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Determinants of Loss of Mammal Species during the Late Quaternary 'Megafauna' Extinctions: Life History and Ecology, but Not Body Size

C. N. Johnson
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 269, No. 1506 (Nov. 7, 2002), pp. 2221-2227
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3558643
Page Count: 7
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Determinants of Loss of Mammal Species during the Late Quaternary 'Megafauna' Extinctions: Life History and Ecology, but Not Body Size
Preview not available

Abstract

Extinctions of megafauna species during the Late Quaternary dramatically reduced the global diversity of mammals. There is intense debate over the causes of these extinctions, especially regarding the extent to which humans were involved. Most previous analyses of this question have focused on chronologies of extinction and on the archaeological evidence for human-megafauna interaction. Here, I take an alternative approach: comparison of the biological traits of extinct species with those of survivors. I use this to demonstrate two general features of the selectivity of Late Quaternary mammal extinctions in Australia, Eurasia, the Americas and Madagascar. First, large size was not directly related to risk of extinction; rather, species with slow reproductive rates were at high risk regardless of their body size. This finding rejects the 'blitzkrieg' model of overkill, in which extinctions were completed during brief intervals of selective hunting of large-bodied prey. Second, species that survived despite having low reproductive rates typically occurred in closed habitats and many were arboreal or nocturnal. Such traits would have reduced their exposure to direct interaction with people. Therefore, although this analysis rejects blitzkrieg as a general scenario for the mammal megafauna extinctions, it is consistent with extinctions being due to interaction with human populations.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
2221
    2221
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2222
    2222
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2223
    2223
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2224
    2224
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2225
    2225
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2226
    2226
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2227
    2227