You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Effects of Inflorescence Size on Pollination in Epilobium angustifolium
Paul Schmid-Hempel and Bernard Speiser
Vol. 53, No. 1 (Jul., 1988), pp. 98-104
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3565669
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Inflorescences, Pollen, Flowers, Plants, Pollinating insects, Plant reproduction, Insect pollination, Female flowers, Bumblebees, Pollination
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In the field, inflorescences of Epilobium angustifolium L. were experimentally manipulated to contain above average (LARGE) or below-average (SMALL) numbers of open flowers. We then estimated size-dependent fitness achieved per open flower from pollinator visitation rates, amount of pollen exported and pollen deposited. On average, rate of bee arrival (the principal pollinators) on LARGE (88 ± 7.9 S.E. arrivals/hour, N = 52) was 1.5 times that of SMALL (59 ± 5.5, N = 53), and bees visited 1.3 times as many flowers before they left (LARGE: 4.3 ± 0.2; SMALL: 3.2 ± 0.1). However, visitation rates to single flowers were similar for both size classes (LARGE: 23 ± 2.1 flowers/hour; SMALL: 24 ± 2.1); no difference with respect to sex of the flowers visited was found. In addition, both pollen export and pollen deposition were similar for the two size groups. We therefore conclude that for single flowers male function (pollen donation) and female function (pollen receipt) are both independent of inflorescence size. However, at the same time, flowers on LARGE inflorescences are visited by a larger number of individually different bees than flowers on SMALL, suggesting a higher diversity of mates for the flowers of LARGE. On LARGE inflorescences bees were also less likely to move directly from male to female flowers. With pollen carryover, however, this latter advantage may be counterbalanced by the generally longer visitation sequences on LARGE (4.3 ± 0.2 flowers/inflorescence/bee; SMALL: 3.2 ± 0.1), leading to a similar proportion of female flowers (incorrectly) visited after a visit to a male (LARGE: 67.6%, N = 146; SMALL: 61.6%, N = 144).
Oikos © 1988 Nordic Society Oikos