You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Do "Language Rights" Serve Indigenous Interests? Some Hopi and Other Queries
Vol. 105, No. 4, Special Issue: Language Politics and Practices (Dec., 2003), pp. 712-722
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3567136
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
While valuable, the discourse of language rights neglects language use in cultural, social, and historical contexts. This article examines some implications of that neglect, especially vis-à-vis small-scale, indigenous, "oral" societies. Drawing principally on Hopi examples, I argue that language rights discourse rests on a reflexivization of language and culture enhanced by globalism. Now reified, language becomes an allegory of ethnic identity. Preexisting sociolinguistic sensibilities get repositioned, for example, in Native American communities in which language has hitherto been deployed as a technique of privacy and sovereignty. language rights ideology is logocentric and presumes a democratic, secular space of language use, conflicting with both privacy and performativity in Native linguistic values. And some linguistic usage reinforces social inequality, both transnationally and group-internally: Here, language rights contradict other human rights. Language rights discourse also requires anthropology to rethink its recent antipathy to the culture concept and to treat language and culture objectively.
American Anthropologist © 2003 American Anthropological Association