Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Do ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ Scavenger Secondary Radicals Protect by Competing with Oxygen for Cellular Target Sites?

David Ewing and Harry L. Walton
Vol. 128, No. 1 (Oct., 1991), pp. 29-36
DOI: 10.2307/3578063
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3578063
Page Count: 8

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
Preview not available

Abstract

Recently, using Chinese hamster V79 cells, we found no relationship between the level of protection and the overall rate for ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ removal [Ewing and Walton, Radiat. Res. 126, 187-197 (1991)]. We offered several possible interpretations for this observation, including that the scavengers may actually have multiple ways to protect, ways that would occur in addition to, or instead of, simple ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ removal. With bacterial spores, we had noted that protection occurs only with those ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ scavengers that are able to react and form secondary, reducing radicals (α-hydroxy radicals, RĊOH), and we suggested that protection might occur if these radicals reduced cellular radical sites in competition with (damaging) reactions of O2. We have now tested that hypothesis with four ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ scavengers (DMSO, ethanol, glycerol, and methanol), and Chinese hamster V79 cells, irradiated while equilibrated with $0.9\%\ {\rm O}_{2}$ and $100\%\ {\rm O}_{2}$; our recent experiments with these scavengers in air provide data for a third O2 concentration. If these scavengers protect in vitro mammalian cells by forming secondary reducing radicals which compete with O2 for damaged cellular sites, we expect that when we reduce the O2 concentration, we will concomitantly reduce the scavenger concentrations needed for protection. If the proposed competition occurs, we expect the scavenger concentrations for 50% maximum effect to occur in the ratio of the three O2 concentrations used ∼1:20:100. We found no evidence for such a competition as the mechanism of protection for these four ${}^{\bullet}{\rm OH}$ scavengers.

• 29
• 30
• 31
• 32
• 33
• 34
• 35
• 36