Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

All's Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters

Erik Gartzke and Quan Li
Journal of Peace Research
Vol. 40, No. 6 (Nov., 2003), pp. 727-732
Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3648387
Page Count: 6
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($40.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
All's Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters
Preview not available

Abstract

Oneal and Barbieri & Peters offer divergent critiques of Gartzke & Li, who present a mathematical identity between competing operationalizations of dyadic interdependence, and show that the relationship one finds between conflict and commerce depends on how one constructs one's dyadic indicator of trade. Oneal seems to accept the identity, but not some of its implications. Barbieri & Peters challenge the identity and offer contrasting results. Here, we show that Barbieri & Peters's results are due to their model specification, which Gartzke & Li argue involves omitted variable bias.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
727
    727
  • Thumbnail: Page 
728
    728
  • Thumbnail: Page 
729
    729
  • Thumbnail: Page 
730
    730
  • Thumbnail: Page 
731
    731
  • Thumbnail: Page 
732
    732