You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Links between the Abundance and Distribution of Birds
Vol. 20, No. 2 (Apr., 1997), pp. 137-145
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3682777
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Species, Aviculture, Breeding, Birds, Sea birds, Birds of prey, Ducks, Waterfowl, Winter, Wading birds
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The relationship between overall abundance, local abundance and distribution is examined for several taxonomic groups of birds in Britain. Among closely-related species, all three measures were correlated: those species with the highest overall numbers also had the highest local numbers and the widest distributions. Within each group, the relationship between overall abundance and distribution was extremely tight (with all the species points close to the trend line) in plots of log distribution (numbers of 10 km squares occupied) against log numbers. The pattern held in summer and winter, and in both resident and migratory species. Moreover, species which, over a period of years, underwent marked change in status showed parallel changes in both breeding numbers and distribution, and followed the pattern found from comparisons between related species. Conversely, species which changed little in numbers over a period of years also changed little in extent of distribution. An explanation of the findings is proposed, based on density-dependent growth of local numbers and dispersal. The relevance of the findings to the limitation of geographical ranges is discussed. The distributional extent of many species seems to depend primarily on their overall numbers, rather than vice versa.
Ecography © 1997 Nordic Society Oikos