You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate
Thomas M. Carsey and Geoffrey C. Layman
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 50, No. 2 (Apr., 2006), pp. 464-477
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694284
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political attitudes, Political partisanship, Party identification, Political parties, Political science, Abortion, Saliency, Government services, Voting, Government spending
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Scholars have long debated the individual-level relationship between partisanship and policy preferences. We argue that partisanship and issue attitudes cause changes in each other, but the pattern of influence varies systematically. Issue-based change in party identification should occur among individuals who are aware of party differences on an issue and find that issue to be salient. Individuals who are aware of party differences, but do not attach importance to the issue, should evidence party-based issue change. Those lacking awareness of party differences on an issue should show neither effect. We test our account by examining individuals' party identifications and their attitudes on abortion, government spending and provision of services, and government help for African Americans using the 1992-94-96 National Election Study panel study, finding strong support for our argument. We discuss the implications of our findings both for the microlevel study of party identification and the macrolevel analysis of partisan change.
American Journal of Political Science © 2006 Midwest Political Science Association