Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

The Admissibility of a Confession against a Co-Defendant: R v Hayter

Deirdre M. Dwyer
The Modern Law Review
Vol. 68, No. 5 (Sep., 2005), pp. 839-848
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Modern Law Review
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699060
Page Count: 10
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Admissibility of a Confession against a Co-Defendant: R v Hayter
Preview not available

Abstract

It has become something of a commonplace to observe that the Anglo-American method of establishing facts in adjudication is distinctive. . . A few of [its 'native flowers'], most notably the hearsay rule, are regarded as so bizarre that they occupy one of the most forbidding corners of the entire Anglo-American legal structure.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[839]
    [839]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
840
    840
  • Thumbnail: Page 
841
    841
  • Thumbnail: Page 
842
    842
  • Thumbnail: Page 
843
    843
  • Thumbnail: Page 
844
    844
  • Thumbnail: Page 
845
    845
  • Thumbnail: Page 
846
    846
  • Thumbnail: Page 
847
    847
  • Thumbnail: Page 
848
    848