You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Admissibility of a Confession against a Co-Defendant: R v Hayter
Deirdre M. Dwyer
The Modern Law Review
Vol. 68, No. 5 (Sep., 2005), pp. 839-848
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699060
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Legal evidence, Admission of guilt, Admissible evidence, Trials, Juries, Out of court settlements, Inadmissible evidence, Guilty verdicts, Hearsay, Criminal prosecution
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
It has become something of a commonplace to observe that the Anglo-American method of establishing facts in adjudication is distinctive. . . A few of [its 'native flowers'], most notably the hearsay rule, are regarded as so bizarre that they occupy one of the most forbidding corners of the entire Anglo-American legal structure.
The Modern Law Review © 2005 Modern Law Review