You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology: A Critical Analysis
International Studies Review
Vol. 6, No. 2 (Jun., 2004), pp. 253-269
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699593
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Feminism, Womens rights, Gender equality, Violence, International relations theory, Gender roles, International relations, Feminist theory, Peacetime, Masculinity
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The purpose of this narrative is to build a bridge among feminist and traditional worldviews within international relations (IR) scholarship. In particular, this essay renews Ann Tickner's appeal for dialogue between feminist and conventional IR scholars. Not only is there room for such dialogue, but it is necessary. The most dogmatic scholars from each worldview generate and perpetuate an artificial divide. The purpose of this essay is to provide an explanation and rationale for a small, but growing, body of research that incorporates elements of gender and social justice into conventional IR theory using various methodologies, including a quantitative approach.
International Studies Review © 2004 Oxford University Press