You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Leonardo Sciascia's "Candido" and Voltaire's "Candide"
Ian R. Morrison
The Modern Language Review
Vol. 97, No. 1 (Jan., 2002), pp. 59-71
Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3735619
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Critics disagree about the extent and nature of the relationship between Sciascia's "Candido" and Voltaire's "Candide." Disagreement arises partly from the number of apparent similarities between the works and partly from inadequate examination of "Candide." This article focuses, therefore, on the three most obvious parallels between the texts and also seeks to pay due attention to Voltaire's tale. The conclusions that emerge are that the two works have a stronger affinity than hitherto suspected, and that the parallels with "Candide" significantly affect the import of "Candido" by emphasizing its pessimism.
The Modern Language Review © 2002 Modern Humanities Research Association