You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Traditional Infrageneric Classification of Gymnopilus Is Not Supported by Ribosomal DNA Sequence Data
Laura Guzmán-Dávalos, Gregory M. Mueller, Joaquín Cifuentes, Andrew N. Miller and Anne Santerre
Vol. 95, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 2003), pp. 1204-1214
Published by: Mycological Society of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3761920
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biological taxonomies, Agaricales, Taxa, We they distinction, DNA, Mycology, Internal transcribed spacers, Phylogeny, Phylogenetics, Polymerase chain reaction
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The traditional classification of Gymnopilus (Agaricales) recognizes two primary groups, Annulati and Gymnopilus, based on the presence or absence of a membranous partial veil. While our analyses of DNA sequence data from the nuclear ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (ITS) gene supports the monophyly of the genus, these traditional subgroups were not recovered. Five well-supported clades within the genus were identified through these analyses: 1) the spectabilis-imperialiś group; 2) nevadensis-penetrans group; 3) a clade formed by G. underwoodii, G. validipes and G. cf. flavidellus; 4) aeruginosus-luteofolius group; and 5) lepidotus-subearlei group. Relationships among these subgroups were not resolved.
Mycologia © 2003 Mycological Society of America