Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Modeling the Impact of Enhanced Depression Treatment on Workplace Functioning and Costs: A Cost-Benefit Approach

Anthony T. Lo Sasso, Kathryn Rost and Arne Beck
Medical Care
Vol. 44, No. 4 (Apr., 2006), pp. 352-358
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3768328
Page Count: 7
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Modeling the Impact of Enhanced Depression Treatment on Workplace Functioning and Costs: A Cost-Benefit Approach
Preview not available

Abstract

Background: The impact of depression on the workplace has been widely observed in studies examining absenteeism and reduced productivity during days at work. However, there is little scientific evidence about whether depression interventions are cost-beneficial to employers. Objective: We construct a cost-benefit analysis of depression treatment under different workplace assumptions better reflecting the nature of employment. Research Design: Data from a randomized controlled trial in which employed primary care patients with depression were treated in practices randomly assigned to an enhanced treatment intervention or usual care were used to construct a cost-benefit model from an employer perspective under different assumptions regarding employment. Subjects: A national sample of 198 workers employed in a range of positions by companies was studied. Measures: Benefits included self-reported productivity and absenteeism; costs included intervention and treatment costs. Net benefit was calculated under different scenarios and return on investment (ROI) is derived. Results: Enhanced depression treatment resulted in an average net benefit to the employer of $30 per participating worker in Year 1 of the intervention and $257 per participating worker in Year 2, for an estimated ROI during the 2-year period of 302%. ROI increased in firms that rely on team production, hire more costly substitute labor, or realize penalties for output shortfalls. ROI decreased in firms that have a large fraction of employees with dependent coverage and experience high turnover rates. Results also are sensitive to how subjectively reported productivity is valued. Conclusion: Many employers will receive a potentially significant ROI from depression treatment models that improve absenteeism and productivity at work.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
352
    352
  • Thumbnail: Page 
353
    353
  • Thumbnail: Page 
354
    354
  • Thumbnail: Page 
355
    355
  • Thumbnail: Page 
356
    356
  • Thumbnail: Page 
357
    357
  • Thumbnail: Page 
358
    358