Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Accuracy of ICD-9-CM Codes for Identifying Cardiovascular and Stroke Risk Factors

Elena Birman-Deych, Amy D. Waterman, Yan Yan, David S. Nilasena, Martha J. Radford and Brian F. Gage
Medical Care
Vol. 43, No. 5 (May, 2005), pp. 480-485
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3768402
Page Count: 6
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Accuracy of ICD-9-CM Codes for Identifying Cardiovascular and Stroke Risk Factors
Preview not available

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to determine which ICD-9-CM codes in Medicare Part A data identify cardiovascular and stroke risk factors. Design and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study comparing ICD-9-CM data to structured medical record review from 23,657 Medicare beneficiaries aged 20 to 105 years who had atrial fibrillation. Measurements: Quality improvement organizations used standardized abstraction instruments to determine the presence of 9 cardiovascular and stroke risk factors. Using the chart abstractions as the gold standard, we assessed the accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes to identify these risk factors. Main Results: ICD-9-CM codes for all risk factors had high specificity (>0.95) and low sensitivity (≤0.76). The positive predictive values were greater than 0.95 for 5 common, chronic risk factors-coronary artery disease, stroke/transient ischemic attack, heart failure, diabetes, and hypertension. The sixth common risk factor, valvular heart disease, had a positive predictive value of 0.93. For all 6 common risk factors, negative predictive values ranged from 0.52 to 0.91. The rare risk factors-arterial peripheral embolus, intracranial hemorrhage, and deep venous thrombosis-had high negative predictive value (≥0.98) but moderate positive predictive values (range, 0.54-0.77) in this population. Conclusions: Using ICD-9-CM codes alone, heart failure, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke can be ruled in but not necessarily ruled out. Where feasible, review of additional data (eg, physician notes or imaging studies) should be used to confirm the diagnosis of valvular disease, arterial peripheral embolus, intracranial hemorrhage, and deep venous thrombosis.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
480
    480
  • Thumbnail: Page 
481
    481
  • Thumbnail: Page 
482
    482
  • Thumbnail: Page 
483
    483
  • Thumbnail: Page 
484
    484
  • Thumbnail: Page 
485
    485