Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Effective Subcutaneous Radiotransmitter Implantation into the Furcular Cavity of Chukars

Pamela Paasché O'Hearn, L. Michael Romero, Rena Carlson and David J. Delehanty
Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973-2006)
Vol. 33, No. 3 (Autumn, 2005), pp. 1033-1046
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3785041
Page Count: 14
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Effective Subcutaneous Radiotransmitter Implantation into the Furcular Cavity of Chukars
Preview not available

Abstract

The wide use of radiotelemetry in avian field studies justifies the continued search for improved methods of attaching transmitters. Subcutaneous implantation of radiotransmitters into the furcular cavity of birds has been proposed to ameliorate many deleterious effects of radiotransmitters (J. Berdeen, South Carolina Cooperative Research Center, personal communication). Using wild adult chukars (Alectoris chukar) brought into captivity, we implanted radiotransmitters subcutaneously into their furcular cavity and compared a suite of behavioral, endocrinological, and physiological measures in implanted chukars with controls. Implanted chukars did not differ from controls in maintenance, agonistic, or reproductive behaviors during 11 weeks of observation. Implanted chukars also did not differ from control chukars in an array of blood values designed to test for infection or implant rejection and did not experience chronic stress based on circulating corticosterone levels. Necropsy indicated complete healing of insertion sites with no signs of infection, foreign body reaction, or rejection. Implanted chukars did not differ from controls in mass, body fat, fecundity, or reproductive condition. We conclude that subcutaneous implantation of radiotransmitters into the furcular cavity was well tolerated by chukars and may prevent deleterious effects associated with other methods of transmitter placement.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1033
    1033
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1034
    1034
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1035
    1035
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1036
    1036
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1037
    1037
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1038
    1038
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1039
    1039
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1040
    1040
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1041
    1041
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1042
    1042
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1043
    1043
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1044
    1044
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1045
    1045
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1046
    1046