You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Dogmatism, Ideology, and Right-Wing Radical Activity
Peri Kedem, Amos Bilu and Zila Cohen (Lizer)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (Mar., 1987), pp. 35-47
Published by: International Society of Political Psychology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3790985
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Radicalism, Dogmatism, Radical parties, Psychological attitudes, Political attitudes, Doctrinal theology, Criminals, Personality psychology, Authoritarianism, Right wing politics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The relationship between dogmatism, authoritarian attitudes, and right-wing radical activity was measured in a "known" radical group, Gush Emunim (N = 34), and in a group of nonactivists (N = 32). The two groups matched on variables known to be correlated with dogmatism (sex, age, religious observance, level of education). The findings were that although dogmatism (Rokeach's D scale) was related to authoritarian attitudes (anti-Arab rights, pro-censorship of media, pro-severe punishment of criminals), it was not related to radical activity. The latter was related only to those attitudes that are part of Gush Emunim's fundamentalist interpretation of religious-Zionistic ideology. These findings buttress the claim that ideology, rather than dogmatic personality, explains radical activity.
Political Psychology © 1987 International Society of Political Psychology