You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attitudes toward a Hypothetical Male or Female Presidential Candidate: A Research Note
Shirley M. Rosenwasser and Jana Seale
Vol. 9, No. 4 (Dec., 1988), pp. 591-598
Published by: International Society of Political Psychology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3791529
Page Count: 8
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Effectiveness of male/female candidates for the presidency and the importance of "masculine"/"feminine" presidential duties were investigated. One hundred forty-one college students read a narrative describing a hypothetical presidential candidate. Candidate sex, salience of candidate sex, and the amount of candidate information provided were varied. Participants also rated the candidate's effectiveness on "masculine," "feminine," and "neutral" presidential duties and rated the importance of these duties. Female candidates were rated higher on "feminine" tasks (p < 0.01) while a trend was found (p < 0.10) for male candidates to be rated higher on "masculine" tasks. "Feminine" presidential tasks, though, were rated as less important than "masculine" presidential tasks (p < 0.001) or "neutral" presidential tasks (p < 0.001). Perhaps "masculine" attributes are necessary for a candidate to be considered for the presidency.
Political Psychology © 1988 International Society of Political Psychology