You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Influence of Sampling Interval on Estimates of Home-Range Size
Robert K. Swihart and Norman A. Slade
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 49, No. 4 (Oct., 1985), pp. 1019-1025
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3801388
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Autocorrelation, Polygons, Sample size, Statistical estimation, Musical intervals, Mammals, Estimate reliability, Estimation bias, Simulations, Data ranges
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Accurate estimation of home-range size often requires large numbers of observations. Radiotelemetry and direct observation are capable of yielding large sample sizes in a short period of time, but observations collected using a short sampling interval often are autocorrelated (i.e., not independent). We examined the effect of autocorrelation on six measures of home range and found that positive autocorrelation resulted in underestimation of home-range size. In long-term studies of movement, sampling intervals should be chosen so that autocorrelation between successive observations is negligible. If home-range estimates must be obtained in a relatively short period of time, collection of autocorrelated data may be unavoidable; under these circumstances nonstatistical measures of home-range size are more appropriate than statistical measures.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 1985 Wiley