Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

An Experimental Test of Interspecific Competition for Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Cavities

Susan C. Loeb and Robert G. Hooper
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 61, No. 4 (Oct., 1997), pp. 1268-1280
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
DOI: 10.2307/3802126
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3802126
Page Count: 13
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
An Experimental Test of Interspecific Competition for Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Cavities
Preview not available

Abstract

To test whether the presence of nest boxes near red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW, Picoides borealis) cavity trees reduced cavity use by other species and improved RCW reproductive success on the Francis Marion National Forest in coastal South Carolina, we placed 3 nest boxes in each of 62 experimental clusters and designated 61 clusters as controls. Our observations of nest box and cavity use showed that nest boxes were somewhat effective in reducing cavity use and that eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and southern flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans) were the most frequent users of nest boxes and cavities. Bluebirds preferred nest boxes to cavities in both years and flying squirrels showed significant preference for nest boxes in 1992. Pretreatment monitoring (1990) of RCW reproductive performance showed no significant differences between control and experimental groups. However, posttreatment monitoring showed that in 1991 RCWs in experimental clusters were significantly more likely to nest than RCWs in control clusters; in 1991 and 1992, they were more likely to fledge ≥1 young. Further, RCWs were less likely to initiate a nest if ≥1 cavity was occupied by a non-RCW species than if no cavities in the cluster were occupied by a non-RCW species. These results indicate that RCW cavities were subject to interspecific competition and that nest boxes may be an effective means of reducing competition, particularly when the number of cavities is limited.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1268
    1268
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1269
    1269
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1270
    1270
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1271
    1271
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1272
    1272
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1273
    1273
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1274
    1274
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1275
    1275
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1276
    1276
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1277
    1277
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1278
    1278
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1279
    1279
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1280
    1280