Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Predicting Greater Prairie-Chicken Nest Success from Vegetation and Landscape Characteristics

Gwen McKee, Mark R. Ryan and Larry M. Mechlin
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 62, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 314-321
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
DOI: 10.2307/3802294
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3802294
Page Count: 8
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Predicting Greater Prairie-Chicken Nest Success from Vegetation and Landscape Characteristics
Preview not available

Abstract

To aid management of prairie habitat for nesting greater-prairie chickens (Tympanuchus cupido pinnatus), we tested whether vegetation and landscape variables could be used to predict prairie-chicken nest success. We monitored 60 nests during the 1990-92 breeding seasons in southwestern Missouri. Nest success ranged from 28 to 40% over 3 years (x̄ = 35%). We identified 2 2-variable models (logistic regression) incorporating litter (horizontal, residual) and woody cover (P < 0.001) or forb and grass cover (P < 0.001) at nests as the best predictors of nest success. Litter cover at the nest was the best single predictor of nest success (P = 0.001). Models incorporating litter cover and distance of nests to edge or tree also predicted nest success (both Ps = 0.004). However, distance of nests to edge or tree alone or in combination did not predict nest success (all Ps > 0.5). Nest sites with litter cover >25% had a failure rate twice that of nests with <25% litter cover (P = 0.002). Nest success declined substantially when woody cover >5% was present at nests (P = 0.01), when forb cover was ≤5% (P = 0.009), or when grass cover was ≤25% (P = 0.02). We suggest that managers can use litter accumulation of >25% as a cue to initiate management action such as burning, grazing, or haying.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
314
    314
  • Thumbnail: Page 
315
    315
  • Thumbnail: Page 
316
    316
  • Thumbnail: Page 
317
    317
  • Thumbnail: Page 
318
    318
  • Thumbnail: Page 
319
    319
  • Thumbnail: Page 
320
    320
  • Thumbnail: Page 
321
    321
Part of Sustainability