You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Role of Hypothesis Testing in Wildlife Science
Douglas H. Johnson
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 66, No. 2 (Apr., 2002), pp. 272-276
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3803159
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Null hypothesis, Wildlife management, Confidence interval, P values, Wildlife, Statistical significance, Hypothesis testing, Wildlife studies, Fowling, Birds
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Statistical testing of null hypotheses recently has come under fire in wildlife sciences (Cherry 1998; Johnson 1999; Anderson et al. 2000, 2001). In response to this criticism, Robinson and Wainer (2002) provide some further background information on significance testing; they argue that significance testing in fact is useful in certain situations. I counter by suggesting that such situations rarely arise in our field. I agree with Robinson and Wainer that replication is the key to scientific advancement. I believe, however, that significance testing and resulting P-values frequently are confused with issues of replication. Any single study can yield a P-value, but only consistent results from truly replicated studies will advance our understanding of the natural world.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 2002 Wiley