Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Providing Reliable and Accurate Genetic Capture-Mark-Recapture Estimates in a Cost-Effective Way

Kevin S. McKelvey and Michael K. Schwartz
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 68, No. 3 (Jul., 2004), pp. 453-456
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3803377
Page Count: 4
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Providing Reliable and Accurate Genetic Capture-Mark-Recapture Estimates in a Cost-Effective Way
Preview not available

Abstract

Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) estimates assume no misidentification of individuals captured and are extremely sensitive to identification errors. A large body of published literature has demonstrated that non-invasively derived genetic tags are error-prone, and the potential biases associated with these errors are large. We provided methods to reduce and evaluate these errors. Paetkau (2004, this issue), in his comments concerning our paper, argues that no formal, statistical error testing is necessary and that good laboratory practices are sufficient to remove all error. However, he provides only anecdotal evidence that this is the case. Given the presence of a variety of errors in genetic tags and the potential for large biases associated with these errors, we argue that scientific norms require formal tests to demonstrate the absence of errors. The primary purpose of our study was to provide such tests in a manner that is not cost-prohibitive.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
453
    453
  • Thumbnail: Page 
454
    454
  • Thumbnail: Page 
455
    455
  • Thumbnail: Page 
456
    456