If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Effects of Hunting on Survival of American Woodcock in the Northeast

Daniel G. McAuley, Jerry R. Longcore, David A. Clugston, R. Bradford Allen, Andrew Weik, Scot Williamson, John Dunn, Bill Palmer, Kevin Evans, Will Staats, Greg F. Sepik and William Halteman
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 69, No. 4 (Oct., 2005), pp. 1565-1577
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3803516
Page Count: 13
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Effects of Hunting on Survival of American Woodcock in the Northeast
Preview not available

Abstract

Numbers of American woodcock (Scolopax minor) males counted on the annual singing ground survey (SGS) have declined over the last 35 years at an average rate of 2.3% per year in the Eastern Region and 1.8% per year in the Central Region. Although hunting was not thought to be a cause of these declines, mortality caused by hunters can be controlled. Furthermore, there has been no research on effects of hunting mortality on woodcock populations at local and regional levels on the breeding grounds. We used radiotelemetry to determine survival rates and causes of mortality for 913 woodcock captured during fall 1997-2000 on 7 areas in Maine, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Vermont, USA. Three of 7 sites were closed to hunting. For all sites and all years combined, 176 woodcock died, and 130 were censored, of which 39 were censored mortalities. Predation was the major (n = 134, 76%) cause of mortality. Mammals accounted for 56% of the predation, raptors accounted for 25%, and 19% was attributed to unknown predators. On hunted sites, 36% of the total mortality (n = 102) was caused by hunting, 63% by predation, and 1 bird starved. Kaplan-Meier survival curves did not differ between hunted and nonhunted sites among years (P = 0.46). Overall, point estimates of survival did not differ (P = 0.217) between hunted (SR = 0.636, SE = 0.04) and nonhunted sites (SR = 0.661, SE = 0.08). We modeled hazard rates from hunting and natural mortality events using program MARK. Akaike's Information Criterion supported using a model with common constant hazards from both hunting and natural causes for groups of sites. Groupings of sites for hazard rates from natural causes were not influenced by whether a site was hunted or not. Models detected no effects of woodcock age and sex (P = 0.52) on survival. Proportional hazards models comparing hunted and nonhunted sites found no effects of age and sex (P = 0.45), interactions of age, sex, capture weight, and bill length (P ≥ 0.269). Our data suggest that current hunting regulations are not causing lower survival of woodcock.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1565
    1565
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1566
    1566
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1567
    1567
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1568
    1568
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1569
    1569
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1570
    1570
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1571
    1571
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1572
    1572
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1573
    1573
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1574
    1574
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1575
    1575
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1576
    1576
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1577
    1577