Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Efficacy of Hunting, Feeding, and Fencing to Reduce Crop Damage by Wild Boars

Hannes Geisser and Heinz-Ulrich Reyer
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 68, No. 4 (Oct., 2004), pp. 939-946
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Wildlife Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3803649
Page Count: 8
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Efficacy of Hunting, Feeding, and Fencing to Reduce Crop Damage by Wild Boars
Preview not available

Abstract

Since 1980, populations of wild boar (Sus scrofa) have increased over the species' entire European range. This increase has led to conflicts because wild boars cause crop damage amounting to several million U.S. dollars every year. Wildlife management agencies promote and financially support 3 major methods to reduce the loss: (1) intensive harvest, (2) supplemental feeding in forests to bait animals for easier shooting and to distract them from agricultural fields, and (3) building electrical fences around crops at risk. Our objective was to investigate how effective these methods were in reducing field damage by wild boars. Based on data from 44 hunting territories in the Canton Thurgau, Switzerland, we related damage frequency to harvest success, supplemental feeding, and fencing effort by means of 2 multiple regression analyses. The analysis of mean damage frequency among territories (averaged over 3 years) and changes in damage frequency within territories from 1994 to 1996 showed that only hunting reduced damage by wild boars. Because our results question the effectiveness of wild boar management practices and wild boar populations and damage are increasing throughout Europe, we suggest that control efforts and funds be reconsidered. Because only hunting seems to clearly reduce wild boar damage, we suggest more emphasis be put on the development and introduction of new harvest models among local hunting teams.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
939
    939
  • Thumbnail: Page 
940
    940
  • Thumbnail: Page 
941
    941
  • Thumbnail: Page 
942
    942
  • Thumbnail: Page 
943
    943
  • Thumbnail: Page 
944
    944
  • Thumbnail: Page 
945
    945
  • Thumbnail: Page 
946
    946