You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Call-Response Surveys for Monitoring Breeding Waterbirds
James P. Gibbs and Scott M. Melvin
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 57, No. 1 (Jan., 1993), pp. 27-34
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3808996
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Wetlands, Broadcasting industry, Waterfowl, Aviculture, Breeding seasons, Breeding, Bird songs, Animal vocalization, Population trends, Habitat conservation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
We broadcast vocalizations of pied-billed grebe (Podilymbus podiceps), American bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus), least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), Virginia rail (Rallus limicola), and sora (Porzana carolina) to derive a standardized method to monitor breeding populations of these secretive waterbirds. Broadcast of tape-recorded calls at 60 wetlands in Maine improved species detectability by 93-1, 320% over passive observation. Detection rates at wetlands where target species were known to occur ranged between 0.56 (least bittern) and 0.86 (pied-billed grebe) per survey visit. Three visits to a wetland were adequate to determine the presence or absence of all species with 90% certainty. Least bitterns, soras, and Virginia rails were detected primarily within 50 m of observers; pied-billed grebes and American bitterns were detected up to 500 m distant. Most responses were aural. Responsiveness of each species varied nonsystematically in relation to seasonal chronology, time of day, wind, precipitation, and cloud cover. Single, annual surveys at a stratified random sample of wetlands (i.e., waterbird "miniroutes") can generate sufficient encounter rates for these species to monitor population trends.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 1993 Wiley