You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Responses of Captive Blackbirds to a New Insecticidal Seed Treatment
Michael L. Avery, David G. Decker, David L. Fischer and Tammy R. Stafford
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 57, No. 3 (Jul., 1993), pp. 652-656
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3809296
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rice, Birds, Seed treatment, Bird pests, Insecticides, Game birds, Wheat, Wildlife damage management, Chemicals, Infestation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Development of new repellent chemicals specifically to control crop damage by birds may be cost-prohibitive. Instead, the use of compounds developed for other pest control needs may be more practical. Thus, we conducted 2-cup feeding trials with singly caged red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) and brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) to test the repellency of a new seed treatment insecticide, imidacloprid (proposed common name for Miles Incorporated NTN33893). Both redwings and cowbirds were strongly deterred (P < 0.05) from feeding on rice seed treated with imidacloprid at 620 and 1,870 ppm. When applied to wheat seed, imidacloprid effectively reduced (P < 0.05) consumption by redwings at rates as low as 165 ppm. We noted treatment-related effects such as ataxia and retching in some birds exposed to the highest treatment levels, but such effects were transitory. Videotapes indicated that imidacloprid was not a sensory repellent or irritant to birds. We conclude that avoidance of imidacloprid-treated food is a learned response mediated by postingestional distress. Although developed and envisioned as a broad spectrum, systemic insecticide, imidacloprid also appears to have promise as a bird repellent seed treatment.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 1993 Wiley