You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Investigating Observer Bias in Aerial Survey by Simultaneous Double-Counts
Alistair Graham and Richard Bell
The Journal of Wildlife Management
Vol. 53, No. 4 (Oct., 1989), pp. 1009-1016
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3809603
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Group size, Population estimates, Estimation bias, Horses, Animals, Area surveys, Statistical estimation, Modeling, Estimation methods, Estimators
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
We adjusted aerial counts of feral horses (Equus caballus) and donkeys (E. asinus) in the Northern Territory of Australia for observer bias in the visible population by an adaptation of the Petersen estimate (Seber 1982:59) based on visual captures. We developed a method of simultaneous double-counts using tandem observers counting groups of animals in the same transect. Observers overlooked 12.8-43.8% of the groups of visible animals in their field of view. The mean probability of seeing a solitary animal was 0.66 and 0.91 for a group of 8. Observed group size increased with height, interpreted as a declining probability of seeing small groups with increasing height. The chances of seeing a group appear to be influenced more by the number of its members than member size. We compared the method with the logically equivalent model of Cook and Jacobson (1979). Both are simple to apply with potential for investigating the causes of observer bias or as practical alternatives to conventional aerial survey methods.
The Journal of Wildlife Management © 1989 Wiley