You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Extracting Valid Sexological Findings from Severely Flawed and Biased Population Samples
Edward M. Brecher and Jeremy Brecher
The Journal of Sex Research
Vol. 22, No. 1, Methodology in Sex Research (Feb., 1986), pp. 6-20
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3812108
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Men, Sampling studies, Dose response relationship, Human sexual behavior, Volunteerism, Proportions, Rheumatoid arthritis, Sexology, Index numbers, Opinion polls
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Since publication of the first Kinsey report (Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948), statisticians have repeatedly criticized human sexuality surveys on the ground tht they are not based on probability samples. But sex surveys are not public opinion polls; they are inquiries utilizing the same scientific techniques relied on in the biological sciences generally: the initial sample of convenience, the comparison-group study, cumulative confirmations and deliberate sampling for heterogeneity, dose-response studies, the exclusion of confounding variables, the recognition of coherent patterns in the data, and others. These are powerful methodological instruments which do not require probability sampling for their efficacy. Probability sampling is needed primarily to answer questions beginning "What proportion of...?" or, "How many...?" For answering such questions, nonprobability samples such as those used in sex surveys are not trustworthy; proportional information should therefore be eliminated from sex survey reports by means of indexing (normalization), except under special circumstances discussed here.
The Journal of Sex Research © 1986 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.