Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Estimating the Rock Volume Bias in Paleobiodiversity Studies

James S. Crampton, Alan G. Beu, Roger A. Cooper, Craig M. Jones, Bruce Marshall and Phillip A. Maxwell
Science
New Series, Vol. 301, No. 5631 (Jul. 18, 2003), pp. 358-360
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3834737
Page Count: 3
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Preview not available
Preview not available

Abstract

To interpret changes in biodiversity through geological time, it is necessary first to correct for biases in sampling effort related to variations in the exposure of rocks and recovery of fossils with age. Data from New Zealand indicate that outcrop area is likely to be a reliable proxy of rock volume in both stable cratonic regions, where the paleobiodiversity record is strongly correlated with relative sea level, and on technically active margins. In contrast, another potential proxy, the number of rock formations, is a poor predictor of outcrop area or sampling effort in the New Zealand case.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
358
    358
  • Thumbnail: Page 
359
    359
  • Thumbnail: Page 
360
    360