You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget's PART Scores
John B. Gilmour and David E. Lewis
Public Administration Review
Vol. 66, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 2006), pp. 742-752
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3843903
Page Count: 11
Preview not available
In this paper, the authors use the Bush administration's management grades from the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) to evaluate performance budgeting in the federal government-in particular, the role of merit and political considerations in formulating recommendations for 234 programs in the president's fiscal year 2004 budget. PART scores and political support were found to influence budget choices in expected ways, and the impact of management scores on budget decisions diminished as the political component was taken into account. The Bush administration's management scores were positively correlated with proposed budgets for programs housed in traditionally Democratic departments but not in other departments. The federal government's most ambitious effort to use performance budgeting to date shows both the promise and the problems of this endeavor.
Public Administration Review © 2006 American Society for Public Administration