You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Comparison of Swab and Maceration Methods for Bacterial Sampling of Pig Carcasses
I. R. Morgan, F. Krautil and J. A. Craven
The Journal of Hygiene
Vol. 95, No. 2 (Oct., 1985), pp. 383-390
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3863189
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Salmonella, Slaughterhouses, Pig carcasses, Sampling methods, Meats, Broths, Bacteria, Maceration, Bacteriology, Surface areas
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A swabbing technique was compared with an excision and maceration technique for bacteriological sampling of pig carcass skin surfaces. Total viable counts at 37 °C obtained by swabbing were 46% of those obtained by maceration. At 21 °C, swabbing gave total viable counts which were 54% of the counts obtained from excision samples. Escherichia coli counts showed wide variation with both sampling methods. Neither method was more efficient than the other in recovering E. coli, although excision sampling gave generally higher counts. Both methods were equally effective at recovering salmonellae from carcass surfaces. There was no significant difference between the methods in recovering particular Salmonella serotypes.
The Journal of Hygiene © 1985 Cambridge University Press