You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Relations between the Consumption of Antimicrobial Growth Promoters and the Occurrence of Resistance among Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Broilers
H.-D. Emborg, J. S. Andersen, A. M. Seyfarth and H. C. Wegener
Epidemiology and Infection
Vol. 132, No. 1 (Jan., 2004), pp. 95-105
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3865848
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Antimicrobials, Temporal logic, Humans, Datasets, Farms, Enterococcus faecium, Animals, Bacteria, Flocks, Feed intake
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The present study investigates, at farm level, the effect of the time-span between sampling and the last time a particular antimicrobial growth promoter (AGP) was included in the feed on the probability of selecting an AGP-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolate from a broiler flock. The probability that a randomly selected E. faecium isolate was resistant to avilamycin, erythromycin or virginiamycin was 0·91, 0·92 and 0·84, respectively if the isolate originated from a broiler flock fed either avilamycin- or virginiamycin-supplemented feed. As the time-span between sampling and the last AGP consumption increased, the probability of isolating an E. faecium isolate resistant to a particular AGP decreased (probability <0·2 within 3-5 years after last exposure to AGPs). The decrease in probability over time showed little farm-to-farm variation. The number of times a particular AGP was given to previous flocks reared in the same house had no effect on the probability of isolating a resistant isolate.
Epidemiology and Infection © 2004 Cambridge University Press