You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Knowing When to Draw the Line: Designing More Informative Ecological Experiments
Kathryn L. Cottingham, Jay T. Lennon and Bryan L. Brown
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Vol. 3, No. 3 (Apr., 2005), pp. 145-152
Published by: Wiley
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3868542
Page Count: 8
Preview not available
Linear regression and analysis of variance (ANOVA) are two of the most widely used statistical techniques in ecology. Regression quantitatively describes the relationship between a response variable and one or more continuous independent variables, while ANOVA determines whether a response variable differs among discrete values of the independent variable(s). Designing experiments with discrete factors is straightforward because ANOVA is the only option, but what is the best way to design experiments involving continuous factors? Should ecologists prefer experiments with few treatments and many replicates analyzed with ANOVA, or experiments with many treatments and few replicates per treatment analyzed with regression? We recommend that ecologists choose regression, especially replicated regression, over ANOVA when dealing with continuous factors for two reasons: (1) regression is generally a more powerful approach than ANOVA and (2) regression provides quantitative output that can be incorporated into ecological models more effectively than ANOVA output.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment © 2005 Wiley