Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

The Use of Comparative Yield and Dry-Weight-Rank Techniques for Monitoring Arid Rangeland

M. H. Friedel, V. H. Chewings and G. N. Bastin
Journal of Range Management
Vol. 41, No. 5 (Sep., 1988), pp. 430-435
DOI: 10.2307/3899584
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3899584
Page Count: 6
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Use of Comparative Yield and Dry-Weight-Rank Techniques for Monitoring Arid Rangeland
Preview not available

Abstract

The comparative yield (CY) method for estimating pasture dry weight and the dry-weight-rank (DWR) method for determining species composition were applied in a variety of arid vegetation types by several operators. The methods were evaluated for their suitability in a range monitoring program, on the basis of consistency of estimates and the time taken. Four calibration regressions for the CY technique were compared initially and, of these, linear regression of untransformed data is recommended. Differences among operators' yield estimates were unacceptably large, and the procedure of standard selection and calibration was too slow. We suggest that photographic standards can reduce the time taken and improve precision. The DWR technique was recommended because operators achieved consistent estimates of species composition within 80 minutes, which we regarded as a reasonable time for a monitoring procedure. Weighted multipliers did not improve composition estimates. The technique was easy to use but initial training of operators was important. While fixed quadrats would probably reduce differences caused by spatial variability, time spent relocating quadrats could be excessive.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
430
    430
  • Thumbnail: Page 
431
    431
  • Thumbnail: Page 
432
    432
  • Thumbnail: Page 
433
    433
  • Thumbnail: Page 
434
    434
  • Thumbnail: Page 
435
    435