You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Wine Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Response to Simulated Herbicide Drift
Kassim Al-Khatib, Robert Parker and E. Patrick Fuerst
Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1993), pp. 97-102
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3987967
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Herbicides, Simulations, Leaves, Plants, Weed control, Wheat, Plant growth, Growing seasons, Symptoms, Canes
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, bromoxynil, 2,4-D, glyphosate, and a combination of 2,4-D plus glyphosate were applied on newly planted and established 'Lemberger' wine grape at 1/3, 1/10, 1/33, and 1/100 of the maximum labelled rate in wheat or fallow to simulate exposure to drifted herbicides. All herbicides produced symptoms on grape but the most severe symptoms were with 2,4-D and the least severe with bromoxynil. Newly planted grape was more sensitive to herbicides than established grape. Although established grape recovered from injury caused by all treatments except 2,4-D and the highest rate of chlorsulfuron and glyphosate, newly planted grape recovered only from lower rates of bromoxynil. All herbicides resulted in diagnostic symptoms, but other symptoms were very similar to those caused by other stresses.
Weed Technology © 1993 Weed Science Society of America