You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Difficult Choices in the New Post-Conflict Agenda: The International Community in Rwanda after the Genocide
Third World Quarterly
Vol. 22, No. 2 (Apr., 2001), pp. 177-189
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3993405
Page Count: 13
Preview not available
Since the genocide, development agencies have spent tens of millions of dollars in Rwanda on justice, governance, security and reconciliation--issues they used to consider far beyond their mandate until very recently. As a result, Rwanda has emerged as one of the countries where the new post-conflict agenda is being most strongly implemented, under extremely difficult conditions. An analysis of donor behaviour in two high politics areas--the nature of the government and justice--shows that deep and unresolved ethical problems exist with this post-conflict agenda. Lack of information and understanding, conflicts between goals and principles, the difficulty of associating the people concerned in an equitable manner--all these and other issues render unclear the ethical basis upon which donors can base decisions which often have life and death implications for thousands of people.
Third World Quarterly © 2001 Third World Quarterly